The cost of improvising
Most managers inherit hiring with the title and invent a method under pressure. The interviews feel fine. The debriefs are theatre. Six months later nobody can say why that person got the offer – and the next hire starts from zero again.
What it is
The whole method, start to finish, applied to a role you are hiring for while the programme runs. You leave with the role defined, an interview loop your team can run without you, and a scorecard that holds up in a debrief. Most participants make a hire before the last session.
Duration
Six weeks
Six weekly live sessions, with a few focused hours on your role between them.
Cohort
Five
Five people, each carrying a live hire, so every role gets worked on in the session.
Work
A live role
The role you are hiring for now is the course material. You finish with it defined, interviewed for and decided.
The case study is the requisition already on your desk. Define the role before anyone walks in, interview for evidence rather than a performance, and decide against a scorecard that was complete before anyone spoke. A method that lives in one person’s head is a bottleneck with good intentions.
Where this is useful
- Managers who inherited hiring along with the title.
- Founders making a first senior hire, where being wrong costs a year.
- People leaders who need one standard that holds across teams.
Where it is not
- Filling a pipeline. I do not source and I do not place.
- A webinar on how to hire.
- Anyone hoping I will make the call for them.